Page 2 of 2: businesses ranked 101-158 of 158. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Reviewers who rent here praise the grounds, cleanliness, and friendly management. Review text is limited, with only a dozen written reviews, and most are years old.
Only three reviews are visible, so evidence is limited. Reviewers praise friendly staff at the model home and the build quality of their homes.
Reviewers describe Tammy Ward as knowledgeable and patient, with clear guidance from search through closing. Several say she answers questions in depth and treats clients with care. Ratings are all five stars across eight reviews. The reviews focus on real estate sales and purchases, not rent-to-own deals.
Reviewers describe a realtor who answers questions quickly and guides clients through each step. Reviews cover both buying and selling, and they praise his local market knowledge. Review text is limited to eight recent reviews.
Recent reviews are split. Several owners praise named staff for quick replies and friendly service. Others report slow document requests, stiff collection steps over a small chargeback, and sharp condo fee increases.
Reviews are few and mixed. Older five-star reviews praise friendly staff and named agents. Two recent one-star reviews raise concerns about front desk service and tenant dealings.
Six Google reviews, all five stars and all from about three years ago. Reviewers describe staff who explained the program and its steps clearly. Evidence is limited, so treat this as a small sample.
Most recent reviewers, many of them owners, describe Menkes as professional and responsive. Several praise clear updates, quick tenant placement, and a smooth onboarding process. A few newer reviews are sharply negative, reporting unanswered emails, unclear responsibility, and a dispute over filming access and rent increases. Named staff come up often. Reviewers thank Evelyn, Kimberly, Merrill, Jo Russel, Dyan, and Lynn for guidance. Owners mention online portal uploads, tax form filing, and weekend email replies. Their website lists services like tenant checks, HST rebate help, and move-in inspections.
Reviews are split. Several older reviewers praise responsive staff and smooth stays, while one recent one-star review says a unit differed from the booking and money was lost. Review evidence is limited.
Limited evidence: 18 Google reviews averaging 4.3, mostly short comments. Recent reviewers praise the home quality and a site supervisor named Leslie. One older review says the builder stays involved after sale.
Summit Park has 40 Google reviews averaging 4.4. Most reviews are five-star and many are older. Only a few recent reviews describe the builder, so evidence is limited.
Reviews are mixed and the evidence is thin. Recent five-star reviews praise agents for being knowledgeable and professional. Older one-star reviews describe unresponsive staff and a buyer deal that went badly.
Limited evidence: 34 Google reviews average 3.9, with most praise for friendly, clear agents. One detailed 1-star review, about a rushed rental agreement, is a serious complaint to weigh.
Reviewers split sharply on this Ancaster property manager. Owners and tenants who praise Tom Cahill describe quick replies and steady guidance. One tenant with recent heating and mold problems describes slow repairs and weak written follow-up, so check how repairs are handled before signing.
Rembrandt Homes has 35 Google reviews averaging 3.7. Review text is limited and mixed, with older praise for staff and finishes and recent reviews raising build quality concerns. Little detail is available.
Nine Google reviews, all five stars, describe a realtor who guides first-time buyers step by step. Reviewers mention patient answers to questions and a friendly, personable style.
Reviewers mostly describe quick replies and a helpful agent named Chris. Renters and owners both mention someone who handles showings and paperwork. Recent reviews are older, and the 1 star complaints about reachability are from six years ago.
Recent reviews from buyers and agents describe friendly staff who answer questions and handle post-move-in warranty items. Older reviews are harsher, citing defects, a disputed property tax claim, and a roof leak. The rating sits at 3.3 across 52 reviews.
Reviewers describe mixed experiences. Several praise named agents for being helpful, patient, and thorough during home searches and moves. Recent one-star reviews report slow replies and unclear brokerage fees after closing.
Review evidence is limited, with 23 Google reviews averaging 4.2. Most reviewers praise post-possession service, especially a named service manager who handled deficiency lists. Some older reviews describe slow fixes and harsher criticism of staff.
Five Google reviews, all five stars, describe a real estate team that answers questions quickly and keeps buyers informed. Reviews are older and few, so the evidence is limited.
Reviewers split sharply. Several describe slow replies, unreturned calls, and billing mix-ups on rent and fees. A few newer reviews praise specific managers for quick, friendly help, and one notes recent improvement.
Only four Google reviews exist, all five-star, so evidence is thin. One reviewer praises agent Steven Cheung for quick call replies and clear explanations for a first-time buyer. Rent-to-own detail is not covered in the reviews.
Four Google reviews, all five stars, mention knowledgeable and informative staff. Reviewers describe professional service and one plans to move ahead with preliminary drawings. Evidence is limited, so treat this profile as an early view.
Recent reviewers mostly describe quick replies and fast repairs from property manager Jamie and the team. Several praise the contract process. Older one and two star reviews raise concerns about showings, deposit requests, and slow email replies.
Reviewers praise sales staff at the design centre, including Anthony and Ashley, for patient, clear answers. Several owners describe leaks, roof problems, and slow repairs after move-in, mostly in older reviews. Recent reviews are fewer and more mixed.
Five Google reviews average 4.4 stars, with most praise coming from reviews that are two to eight years old. Reviewers mention friendly office and on-site staff. The evidence is limited, so treat it as a small sample.
Most recent reviewers describe a professional, responsive team that keeps buyers informed. Many say the process felt smooth and the homes meet their expectations. Several 5-star reviews are short and general, with little detail about specific services. Two older reviews are harsh. One describes siding and roof problems and unfinished interiors. Another says the builder did not take responsibility when spoken to. Newer reviews do not repeat these complaints, though they are older and the rating sits at 3.1 across 76 reviews.
Reviewers split sharply. Several praise on-site superintendents as hard working and kind, while many recent reviews describe slow replies, rude emails, and hard-to-reach head office staff. Deposit refunds and rent billing disputes also come up often. Summer cooling is the most repeated complaint. One tenant says balcony air conditioners were switched to heat-only and set centrally, leaving units hot. Landscaping and snow clearing are also raised as weak spots.
Four Google reviews give this Hamilton Centre listing a five-star average. No review text is available, so the service experience is hard to judge.
Four Google reviews give this London townhome community a 5 average. One reviewer, eight years ago, says repair and service requests get handled quickly. Review detail is very limited.
Reviews are split. Several guests praise responsive staff and furnished units near Allan Gardens. Older and lower-rated reviews describe bed bugs, unit condition, and disputed refunds. Limited review evidence overall.
Only five Google reviews exist, and two short written reviews are provided. One reviewer praises a responsive, helpful team, and another praises an agent named Greg Williams. Evidence is limited.
Five Google reviews, all five-star, describe agent Dave Mitchell helping with home sales and purchases across York Region. Reviews are older, with the newest about seven years old. Detail is limited.
Only four reviews are visible, and they are mostly older. Reviewers praise sales staff and warranty follow-up. One older reviewer reports long delays and poor communication. Evidence is limited.
Only three Google reviews exist, so evidence is thin. One reviewer, five years ago, praised the builder for keeping model homes open long enough to compare one-storey and two-storey layouts.
Five Google reviews give this Etobicoke agency a 4.2 average. Most praise is from older reviews about pre-construction condos. Review evidence is limited, so treat the picture as thin.
Only 16 Google reviews exist, and they split sharply between five stars and one or two stars. Recent feedback is thin: one resident praises the staff and common areas, while another reports ongoing water problems.
Recent reviews are mostly one and two star. Tenants say maintenance requests go unanswered and that staff treat some residents unevenly. A 2025 tenant describes repeated power and water shut-offs during construction. Older reviews, from years ago, praise quick repairs and kind staff.
Only one Google review exists, and it rates the business five stars. No review text is available, so reviewer experience is hard to judge. Their website describes apartment rentals in Etobicoke with published rent figures.
Review evidence is limited: 13 Google reviews, with a 3.4 average. Older reviews praise quick repairs and friendly staff, while several older complaints describe rude calls and slow communication.
Recent reviews mostly describe unfinished repairs, slow email replies after closing, and doubts about build quality. A few older five-star reviews praise specific staff and a completed shower repair. Ratings sit low at 2.7 across 33 reviews.
Four Google reviews, all five stars and all from two years ago. Reviewers praise agents who answer questions patiently and know the market. One reviewer says the website lets them browse MLS listings and book showings.
Reviews are mostly negative, with many one-star complaints about pests, repairs, and unanswered messages in Central London units. A few older reviews praise the landlord and quick fixes. Evidence is limited and dated.
Only five reviews were available, so evidence is thin. Reviews are split: one renter praised layout, while a resident of a Middleton community reported unfinished driveways, curbs and drains and slow replies.
Shan Homes has five Google reviews averaging 4.2. Reviewers praise the patience, clear explanations, and honesty of the agent, Shan. The reviews are older, and only one is a short one-star comment with no detail.
Reviews are split. Recent reviewers mention friendly, responsive staff, while other recent reviews describe unresponsive contact and entry without notice. Review evidence is limited.
Limited evidence: 12 Google reviews average 1.8 stars, and most recent reviews are unfavourable. Mixed older feedback praises repair follow-up and a clean move-in, but reports of pests and missed contact appear repeatedly.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review text is not available for this listing, so no reviewer experience can be reported. The business has a verified Google listing in Central Hamilton and publishes opening hours. Details below come from the business's own website and are its claims only.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Ocean Breeze Homes is a Google-verified business in North York, Toronto. No individual reviews were available, so review evidence is very limited. Their website describes architecture, construction, and renovation services.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-10-30